GMSR has successfully represented lawyers, accountants, trustees, and other professionals accused of a wide range of malfeasance, and we are intimately familiar the ins and outs of appeals from anti-SLAPP proceedings.
Shelden v. Grossman (Oct. 3, 2006, B184270) 2006 WL 2808155 [nonpublished opinion]
GMSR appellate lawyers Ted Xanders and Robin Meadow were responsible for the victory in this legal malpractice/fraud action against a law firm. The plaintiff alleged that the firm had helped its client, the plaintiff’s stepfather, to induce the plaintiff’s mother to leave all her property
Hughes v. Reynolds (Sept. 20, 2006, A108283) 2006 WL 2687001 [nonpublished opinion]
Probate court’s independent discretion over custodial accounts established under Uniform Transfer to Minors Act
In re Estate of Hughes (Sept. 20, 2006, A109497) 2006 WL 2686989 [nonpublished opinion]
Propriety of trustee accountings and asserted violations of trust; executors’ asserted gross negligence in paying claims against estate
Fremont Indem. Co. v. Fremont Gen. Corp. (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 50
Lawyer not disqualified where he represented both parties while they were adverse in a third action
Marshall v. Marshall (2006) 547 U.S. 293
Claims based on interference with an inter vivos trust do not fall within the “probate” exception to federal jurisdiction
Bank of the West v. Lewschin (Sept. 10, 2004, B174128) 2004 WL 2011451 [nonpublished opinion]
Whether beneficiary’s objections to trustee’s accounting barred by prior probate rulings
Rosenblum v. Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan (Nov. 30, 2004, B173793)
Legal malpractice in negotiating acquisition agreement (settled before decision)
Black v. Yuja (Mar. 25, 2003, B152979) 2003 WL 1521993 [nonpublished opinion]
Obtaining reversal for doctor in medical malpractice case
Marshall v. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher (2000, B137062)
Tolling of statute of limitations pending outcome of underlying action
Marshall v. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher (1998, B114188)
Legal malpractice – representing both partnership and one of its partners in drafting a partnership compensation plan
Browse By Practice Area
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.