One Bite of the Apple, Los Angeles Daily Journal (July 27, 2015)
Los Angeles Daily Journal (July 27, 2015)Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b) offers lawyers an important lifeline – in certain circumstances, it requires the court to vacate a default judgment resulting from attorney mistake or neglect. But what happens when the court rejects as lawyer’s
True Friends Offer Something New, Appellate Issues (Summer 2014)
This article appears in the online publication Appellate Issues, published by the ABA’s Judicial Division Appellate Judges Conference Council of Appellate Lawyers. Read Article
Improved Adequacy through Improved Accuracy: Rule 10(e) and the Record on Appeal, Appellate Issues (Summer 2015)
This article appears in the online publication Appellate Issues, published by the ABA’s Judicial Division Appellate Judges Conference Council of Appellate Lawyers. Read Article
Receipts, Records and Class Actions, Daily Journal (April 9, 2015)
Should ascertainability present a low hurdle for small-dollar class action plaintiffs or should courts be more demanding as to the reliability of proposed class members’ “say-so”? Geoff Kehlmann reviews the cases in the Ninth Circuit that have teed up this question in an April 9,
In a March 25, 2015 Daily Journal article, Alana Rotter offers guidance on determining whether a “judgment” is final and appealable
California Code of Civil Procedure section 904.1 permits appeals from final judgments, but not from most interlocutory judgments. In the Daily Journal, Alana Rotter explains how to determine whether a judgment is final for appellate purposes and discusses a recent California Court of Appeal decision
Lessons from appeals of nonappealable ‘judgments’, Los Angeles Daily Journal (March 25, 2015)
California Code of Civil Procedure section 904.1 permits appeals from final judgments, but not from most interlocutory judgments. In the Daily Journal, Alana Rotter explains how to determine whether a judgment is final for appellate purposes and discusses a recent California Court of Appeal decision
E-Discovery: Lean, Green, but Not Unseen, Appellate Issues (Winter 2015)
This article appears in the online publication Appellate Issues, published by the ABA’s Judicial Division Appellate Judges Conference Council of Appellate Lawyers. Read Article
Q&A With Lawyers & Judges, Appellate Issues (Winter 2015)
This article appears in the online publication Appellate Issues, published by the ABA’s Judicial Division Appellate Judges Conference Council of Appellate Lawyers. Read Article
ICSID jurisdiction over international mass investment arbitrations: Due process and default rules, 51 Stan. J. Int’l. L. 173 (2015)
To read the article, click here.
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.