Plaintiff was injured when a mall patron pulling into a parking space perpendicular to the curb pressed the accelerator instead of the brake, causing the vehicle to jump a concrete wheel-stop and the curb. The Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment for GMSR’s client, the shopping-mall owner. It reaffirmed its holding from nearly 30 years ago that, absent prior similar incidents, a car jumping a curb while parking is unforeseeable, and hence, property owners owe no duty to protect against such an event.
In affirming summary judgment for the shopping mall owner, the Court of Appeal rejected the plaintiff’s extensive attempts to revisit this conclusion, including rejecting misleading expert statistics purporting to show that such incidents are common.
Click here to read the Court of Appeal Opinion: Beaudreau v. Burnham USA Equities, Inc. et al. (Aug. 23, 2022, G059971) 2022 WL 3593351 [nonpublished opinion].
Today, following GMSR’s longtime tradition, we turned on the “Pink Light” to celebrate our clients’ win.
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.