For 15 years, the executors of Michael Jackson’s estate have been managing estate assets and operating his businesses. The executors petitioned the probate court to approve a transaction in which the estate would transfer some assets to a joint venture with a third party, in return for cash and a joint-venture interest. Michael’s mother Katherine Jackson objected, arguing that the transaction was unnecessary and contrary to Michael’s wishes. The probate court overruled her objection and approved the executors’ proposal.
Mrs. Jackson appealed, arguing for the first time that under Michael’s will, his executors did not even have the power to execute the transaction. GMSR, as appellate co-counsel for the executors, responded that Mrs. Jackson had forfeited the argument by not raising it below and that it was meritless. The Court of Appeal agreed, holding that the argument was forfeited, and even if the Court reached the merits, “we necessarily would affirm because the order does not violate either the will’s terms or established probate law.”
Click here to read the Court of Appeal opinion: Branca v. Jackson (Aug. 21, 2024, B328505) 2024 WL 3884219 [Second District, Division Three]
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.