Rental property managers in San Luis Obispo received anonymous letters threatening to shoot them and their tenants if they rented properties to minorities. The police identified a chief suspect, Richard Orcutt, and contacted one of Orcutt’s prior co-workers, city fire official John MacDonald. MacDonald stated that in his opinion, the handwriting in the letters matched Orcutt’s handwriting, but asked not to be involved in further investigation or prosecution. After Orcutt’s arrest, MacDonald testified at a preliminary hearing under subpoena. Eventually, the District Attorney’s office dismissed the charges against Orcutt because an FBI analysis could not confirm the writing was Orcutt’s. Orcutt then sued MacDonald for malicious prosecution. The trial court granted MacDonald’s anti-SLAPP motion and dismissed the case.
Representing MacDonald on appeal, GMSR argued that the anti-SLAPP order should be affirmed on multiple, independent grounds. Although any of those arguments would have been sufficient to affirm, the Court of Appeal agreed with GMSR on each alternative argument: There was no evidence that MacDonald sought out the police. There was no evidence that he had falsely reported facts (as opposed to giving his lay opinion). Orcutt had not presented sufficient evidence that MacDonald lacked probable cause. And there was no evidence of malice or improper purpose.
To read the Court of Appeal Opinion, click here: Orcutt v. MacDonald (Mar. 16, 2023, B319016) 2023 WL 2532025 [Second District, Division Six].
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.