California Supreme Court Watch

Dec 18, 2024 Cynthia E. Tobisman, Alana H. Rotter
Dhital v. Nissan North America, Inc., S277568.

#23-22 Dhital v. Nissan North America, Inc., S277568. (A162817; 84 Cal.App.5th 828; Alameda County Superior Court; RG19009260.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, S272113 (#22-29) which presents the following issue: Under California law, are claims for fraudulent concealment exempted from the economic loss rule?

Petition for review granted; briefing deferred: 2/01/2023

Dismissed and remanded to CA 1/4: 12/18/2024

“Review in the above-captioned matter, which was granted and held for Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (2024) 17 Cal.5th 1, is hereby dismissed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(b)(1).)”

Votes: Guerrero, C. J., Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Groban, Jenkins and Evans, JJ.

See the Court of Appeal Opinion.

See the Petition for Review.

See the Answer to Petition for Review filed by Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP