#23-22 Dhital v. Nissan North America, Inc., S277568. (A162817; 84 Cal.App.5th 828; Alameda County Superior Court; RG19009260.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, S272113 (#22-29) which presents the following issue: Under California law, are claims for fraudulent concealment exempted from the economic loss rule?
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred: 2/01/2023
See the Court of Appeal Opinion.
See the Petition for Review.
See the Answer to Petition for Review filed by Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.