The probate court had appointed GMSRs’ clients – professional fiduciaries – as special administrators to manage decedent’s businesses after her death. When the special administrators examined the companies’ finances, they discovered evidence suggesting that appellant had engaged in mismanagement and fraud. They locked him out of the business, and he responded by resisting a petition to appoint them as general administrators. The probate court made the general appointment over appellant’s objections. He appealed, claiming that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his objections – and that the absence of such a hearing was a structural error, requiring reversal.
The Court of Appeal disagreed and affirmed. The court adopted GMSR’s arguments that appellant had waived any right to an evidentiary hearing and that appellant failed to raise any material contest to the appointment petition.
California Court of Appeal Opinion – View Document
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.