Cases
GMSR has an enviable record of success on appeal. For your convenience, the firm has provided a simple search tool for guests and clients to search that record.
Friend of Camden, Inc. et al. v. Brandt (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 1054
Court of Appeal reverses order permitting statutory buyout of GMSR client’s interest in an LLC
Rycz v. Superior Court of San Francisco County (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 824
Reversing the trial court, the Court of Appeal holds that the increasing acceptance of remote testimony does not necessarily limit venue changes based on witness convenience
Palomar Health v. American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company (9th Cir. July 28, 2022, No. 21-56073) 2022 WL 3006356 [mem. disp.]
The Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of Covid-related insurance coverage suit against GMSR’s client based on policy’s exclusions
Meiri v. Shamtoubi (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 606
Court of Appeal affirms order enforcing No Contest clause, making new law on the probable cause standard
Quintero v. Ford Motor Company (9th Cir. July 21, 2022, No. 20-55883) 2022 WL 2869771
The Ninth Circuit rules that GMSR’s clients did not abandon a favorable jury verdict merely by arguing that post-judgment proceedings were unnecessary
Sanchez v. Los Angeles Department of Transportation (9th Cir. 2022) 39 F.4th 548 (amicus)
City of Los Angeles prevails in Ninth Circuit e-scooter appeal, supported by GMSR’s amicus brief
Coastline JX Holdings LLC v. Bennett (2022) 80 Cal.App.5th 985
Court of Appeal affirms attorney fee rulings favorable to GMSR’s client, and finds appellant forfeited his merits argument
Coastline JX Holdings LLC v. Letwak & Bennett (May 16, 2022, G059646) 2022 WL 1534602
Court of Appeal reverses order setting aside default judgment
Foxcroft Productions, Inc. v. Universal City Studios, LLC (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 1119
On behalf of Columbo creators, GMSR persuades Court of Appeal to reinstate a fraud claim and keep alive a breach of contract claim involving Universal Studios’ failure to pay tens of millions in royalties
A. A. v. County of Riverside (9th Cir. Mar. 18, 2022, No. 20-55960) 2022 WL 822187
The Ninth Circuit affirms attorney fee award reducing plaintiff’s recovery in light of her limited success
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.