Cases
GMSR has an enviable record of success on appeal. For your convenience, the firm has provided a simple search tool for guests and clients to search that record.
LSI Corporation v. Gunnam et al. (May 22, 2023, H049521, H049523) 2023 WL 3577288
GMSR secures reversal of anti-SLAPP dismissal on the basis of circumstantial evidence
HT-Seattle Owner, LLC v. Am. Guar. & Liab. Ins. Co. (9th Cir. May 19, 2023, No. 21–35916) 2023 WL 3562996 [mem. disp.]
Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of hotel’s property insurance claim for pandemic-related business losses
Pham et al. v. Southern California Edison Company (May 2, 2023, B316026) 2023 WL 3189810
Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment, finding no duty in case alleging inadequate streetlighting by public utility
Starlight Cinemas, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (2023) 91 Cal.App.5th 24
Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of movie theater’s property insurance claim for pandemic-related business losses
Orcutt v. MacDonald (Mar. 16, 2023, B319016) 2023 WL 2532025
GMSR wins affirmance of anti-SLAPP order, striking malicious prosecution claim against individual who assisted police officers
In-N-Out Burgers v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co. (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2023, No. 22-55266) 2023 WL 2445681 [mem. disp.]
GMSR notches another appellate win in high-stakes COVID insurance litigation
First Motor Group of Encino, LLC et al. v. Encino Motorcars, LLC et al. (Mar. 10, 2023, B303094) 2023 WL 2445641
Court of Appeal affirms defense verdict in $40 million case alleging false financial statements, finding no prejudice from claimed instructional error
Downie v. Rama Fund, LLC (Mar. 3, 2023, E078068) 2023 WL 2340619
Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of wrongful foreclosure, contract, and quiet title claims against GMSR’s client
JPV I, L.P. v. Koetting (2023) 304 Cal.App.5th 550
Court of Appeal reverses denial of alter ego motion
Williams v. FCA US LLC (2023) 88 Cal.App.5th 44
GMSR secures another Court of Appeal win holding that manufacturers cannot offset their Song-Beverly Act damages by amounts the plaintiff receives for trading in a “lemon” vehicle
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.