Cases
GMSR has an enviable record of success on appeal. For your convenience, the firm has provided a simple search tool for guests and clients to search that record.
Turner v. GJ Property Services, Inc. (July 24, 2024, B319443) 2024 WL 3517402
Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for property manager in premises liability dispute
In re Marriage of Wiese (2024) 102 Cal.App.5th 917
Published Court of Appeal opinion decides statute of limitations for breaches of spousal fiduciary duties
Lorch v. Superior Court of San Diego County (2024) 101 Cal.App.5th 1266
Court of Appeal invalidates San Diego County Local Rule 2.1.3 and vacates judgment entered after judge rejected peremptory challenge
Stiles v. Kia Motors America, Inc. (2024) 101 Cal.App.5th 913
Court of Appeal’s published opinion holds that California lemon law protects used car buyers with active new-car warranties
In re Marriage of Saab and Zagorsky (Apr. 24, 2024, A166160) 2024 WL 1756082
Court of Appeal affirms family court decision based on fundamental appellate rules
Niedermeier v. FCA US LLC (2024) 15 Cal.5th 792
California Supreme Court: GMSR’s consumer client is entitled to full statutory restitution under California’s lemon law—without offset
Colyear v. Rolling Hills Community Association of Rancho Palos Verdes (2024) 100 Cal.App.5th 110
Court of Appeal affirms ruling prohibiting homeowners association from cutting mature trees on GMSR’s client’s property
Oshodin v. Fire Insurance Exchange (Feb. 29, 2024, B319043) 2024 WL 854436
Court of Appeal affirms that a homeowner’s non-specific request to an insurance agent to cover “everything in the house” creates no duty requiring the agent to advise the insured about the inadequacy of their jewelry coverage
Javidian v. Subaru of America, Inc. (Feb. 16, 2024, B322136) 2024 WL 653239
Court of Appeal reverses rulings shortening time to file attorney fee motion and denying motion as untimely
Conrado v. CLS Landscaping Management, Inc., et al. (Nov. 27, 2023, D081551) 2023 WL 8178728
In a motor vehicle negligence case, the Court of Appeal reverses judgment and $500,000 cost-of-proof attorney fee award
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.