Plaintiff filed a negligence action against GMSR’s client, a shopping center owner, alleging that he was injured when he walked into a pole in a landscaped area separating a parking lot from the sidewalk. A jury found in favor of the property owner. Plaintiff appealed, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff’s pre-trial motion to supplement his expert witness list to add a new expert and in excluding from evidence at trial a computer animation of the incident. Agreeing with GMSR that plaintiff failed to preserve those issues in the trial court and that, in any event, there was no abuse of discretion, the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in favor of the property owner.
California Court of Appeal Opinion – View Document
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.