The Town of Apple Valley initiated condemnation proceedings to acquire a local water utility. The Town issued all statutorily-required resolutions of necessity, compiling a massive administrative record. After a lengthy bench trial where the parties fought over the proper standard of review, the trial court determined that the Town could not acquire the utility and awarded the utility more than $13 million in attorney fees. The Town appealed.
In a published opinion, the Court of Appeal reversed on four separate grounds and directed the trial court to conduct further proceedings. The Court reasoned: (1) the trial court applied the wrong standard of review, failing to afford proper deference to the Town’s findings; (2) in any event, the trial court failed to apply its own chosen standard of review correctly; (3) the trial court erred in improperly basing its decision on facts arising after the Town adopted its resolutions of necessity; and (4) the trial court erred in concluding that it lacked the power to remand the matter back to the Town to consider post-resolution events.
To read the Court of Appeal Opinion, click HERE.
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.