GMSR’s client tentatively agreed to a settlement for a fixed amount, plus attorney fees to be resolved via motion. After the parties notified the trial court about their tentative settlement, the court set a hearing on an order to show cause regarding dismissal. The court ordered the parties to file any attorney fee motion before that hearing date—which was long before the fees motion deadline under California Rules of Court, rule 3.1702. When GMSR’s client filed the fee motion after the court’s deadline but within Rule 3.1702’s allotted time, the court denied the motion as untimely.
The Court of Appeal reversed, agreeing with GMSR that the trial court lacked authority to shorten Rule 3.1702’s deadline, and that the Rule’s history “supports the conclusion that trial courts do not have unlimited authority to shorten the specified time limits for filing a motion for attorney fees.” The Court remanded and directed the trial court to address the fee motion on the merits.
To read the Court of Appeal Opinion, click HERE.
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.