A jury found in favor of plaintiffs on their fraud complaint in a commercial real estate case. Defendants moved for JNOV and a new trial, arguing that plaintiffs failed to prove the value of their limited partnership interests and/or failed to prove a reasonable basis for calculating damages, and that the trial court erred as a matter of law in its calculation of prejudgment interest. The trial court denied defendants’ motions.
Defendants appealed, challenging the sufficiency of evidence supporting the awards of compensatory damages and compound prejudgment interest.
The Court of Appeal affirmed.
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.