Gonzalez v. Aluminum Precision Products, S285618.
#24-140 Gonzalez v. Aluminum Precision Products, S285618. (B327278; nonpublished opinion; Ventura County Superior Court; 56-2022-00571822-CU-OEVTA.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Turrieta v. Lyft, Inc., S271721 (#22-03), which
In re Z.C., S277229.
#22-317 In re Z.C., S277229. (C094803; nonpublished opinion; Yolo County Superior Court; JV20193243.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile court proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred in In re E.T. and In re Z.C. pending decision in In re
In re E.T., S277264.
#22-316 In re E.T., S277264. (B315104; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 19CCJP05355.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile court proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred in In re E.T. and In re Z.C. pending decision in In
In re A.G., S285658.
#24-166 In re A.G., S285658. (B331398; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 22CCJP02589.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending finality of the decision in In re Dezi C. (2024)
In re Ryder S., S284423.
#24-96 In re Ryder S., S284423. (B330204; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 22CCJP01821.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order in a juvenile proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in In re Dezi C., S275578 (#22-254), which
In re X.R., S278928.
#23-74 In re X.R., S278928. (B318808; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 20CCJP05092A.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in In re Dezi C., S275578 (#22 254),
In re D.D., S278070.
#23-38 In re D.D., S278070. (B319941; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 18CCJP02204.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in In re Dezi C., S275578 (#22-254), which
Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn. v. County of Los Angeles, S286264.
#24-196 Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn. v. County of Los Angeles, S286264. (B326977; 102 Cal.App.5th 1167; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCP03475.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1)
Salami v. Los Robles Regional Medical Center, S286557.
#24-194 Salami v. Los Robles Regional Medical Center, S286557. (B327348; 103 Cal.App.5th 1023; Ventura County Superior Court; 56-2021-00560715-CU-BC-VTA.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Capito v. San Jose
TRC Operating Co., Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc., S286233.
#24-180 TRC Operating Co., Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc., S286233. (F083724; 102 Cal.App.5th 1040; Kern County Superior Court; S1500-CV-282520_JEB.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed and reversed orders in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. The court limited review to
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.