Lurching Toward E-Filing
Federal appellate courts mastered e-filing many years ago, and it’s the norm nationwide. But state appellate courts in California still have not fully implemented it. Here’s a summary of where things stand:
- The state Supreme Court forbids e-filing for merits briefs, but as of September 1, will require e-filing for Petitions for Review and all other pleadings coming before the grant/denial of review. (Right now e-filing is voluntary, and clerks are still getting used to it.)
- Five of our six District Courts of Appeal require that virtually everything be e-filed. But their local rules vary—sometimes in open conflict with the California Rules of Court. Small infractions can cause rejected filings; for example one district still requires hand-signatures, while another decrees that no PDF shall have any color whatsoever.
- The Second District in Los Angeles, the largest and busiest district of our Court of Appeal, is still transitioning to full e-filing. Briefs must be e-filed, but the court requires paper copies too (which other districts forbid). Record material supporting appeals and writs must be paper-filed, while preliminary forms and motions must be solely electronic.
► The practical message: State appellate courts will arrive at universal e-filing, and most local practices will eventually align. But for the foreseeable future, successful filing requires extra diligence and preparation time by counsel and staff.