Truck Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court (Golden State Developers, Inc.) (2013) 2013 Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 5487 (California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division One) [unpublished]. In an insurance coverage dispute, the trial court, purporting to apply the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege, ordered production of hundreds of documents reflecting confidential attorney-client communications and ordered deponents at upcoming depositions to answer questions seeking confidential attorney-client communications. It reasoned that its prior denial of summary judgment on a malicious prosecution claim and its findings of potential insurance coverage sufficed to make the crime-fraud exception applicable. GMSR filed a petition for writ of mandate arguing that there was no showing of any crime or fraud as required by the crime-fraud exception. The Court of Appeal agreed, and ordered the trial court to vacate its discovery orders.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.