A bus passenger was injured when she slipped and fell on a bus operated by GMSR’s client, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). The passenger sued the MTA, alleging that the bus driver had negligently caused her to fall by accelerating prematurely.
After a jury rejected her claims, the passenger appealed. She argued that the trial court: (1) failed to instruct the jury that the general duty of care only applied to plaintiff and not to the MTA—a common-carrier subject to a heightened standard of care; (2) improperly instructed the jury regarding dangerous-condition-of-public-property principles even though she had withdrawn that claim; (3) improperly excluded an after-incident report; and (4) wrongly excluded, as unnecessary, the testimony of plaintiff’s safety expert, Brad Avrit.
The Court of Appeal affirmed. Agreeing with GMSR, it held that the duty-of-care instructions were correct, the passenger failed to prove that the dangerous-condition instructions constituted reversible error, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the after-incident report or safety expert’s testimony.
To read the Court of Appeal Opinion, click HERE.
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.