JJD-HOV Elk Grove, LLC v. Jo-Ann Stores, LLC, S275843.
#22-263 JJD-HOV Elk Grove, LLC v. Jo-Ann Stores, LLC, S275843. (C094190; 80 Cal.App.5th 409; Sacramento County Superior Court; 34201900248163CUBCGDS.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1) What analytical framework should
Rivera v. Superior Court, S287725.
#24-264 Rivera v. Superior Court, S287725. (B334522; 105 Cal.App.5th 288; Ventura County Superior Court; 56-2022-00568507-CU-BC-VTA.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Ford Motor Warranty Cases, S279969 (#23-148),
Sunflower Alliance v. Department of Conservation, S287414.
#24-260 Sunflower Alliance v. Department of Conservation, S287414. (A167698; 104 Cal.App.5th 1135, mod. 105 Cal.App.5th 771; Contra Costa County Superior Court; N221503.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. The court limited
Sellers v. Superior Court, S287164.
#24-259 Sellers v. Superior Court, S287164. (C100036; 104 Cal.App.5th 468; Sacramento County Superior Court; 21FE018661.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate. This case presents the following issues: (1) Does the presence of 0.36 grams of loose
J.O. v. Superior Court, S287285.
#24-257 J.O. v. Superior Court, S287285. (C102071; nonpublished order; San Joaquin County Superior Court; STKMHLPSC20160000110.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate in a conservatorship proceeding. The court issued an order to show cause why the relief
Dhital v. Nissan North America, Inc., S277568.
#23-22 Dhital v. Nissan North America, Inc., S277568. (A162817; 84 Cal.App.5th 828; Alameda County Superior Court; RG19009260.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, S272113 (#22-29)
Kia America v. Superior Court (Spellman), S273170.
22-104 Kia America v. Superior Court (Spellman), S273170. (D079858; summary denial of petition for writ of mandate; San Diego Superior Court; Spellman v. Kia America, Inc.; 37-2021-00010801-CU-BC-CTL). Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate. The Court ordered
City of Oxnard v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, S287599.
#24-242 City of Oxnard v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, S287599. (B328083; nonpublished opinion; Ventura County Superior Court; 56-2022-00563903-CU-MCVTA.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in City of San Jose
Mayor v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., S287261.
#24-234 Mayor v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., S287261. (A169465; 104 Cal.App.5th 713, mod. 104 Cal.App.5th 1297; Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board; ADJ10036954.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate in a Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board proceeding. This
Fox Paine & Co., LLC v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co., S287404.
#24-232 Fox Paine & Co., LLC v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co., S287404. (A168803; 104 Cal.App.5th 1034; San Francisco County Superior Court; CGC17557275.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed judgments in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1) Where
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.